American  militants like Anwar al-Awlaki are placed on a kill or capture list by a  secretive panel of senior government officials, which then informs the  president of its decisions, according to officials.
There is no public record of  the operations or decisions of the panel, which is a subset of the White  House's National Security Council, several current and former officials  said. Neither is there any law establishing its existence or setting  out the rules by which it is supposed to operate.
The  panel was behind the decision to add Awlaki, a U.S.-born militant  preacher with alleged al Qaeda connections, to the target list. He was  killed by a CIA drone strike in Yemen late last month.
The  role of the president in ordering or ratifying a decision to target a  citizen is fuzzy. White House spokesman Tommy Vietor declined to discuss  anything about the process.
Current  and former officials said that to the best of their knowledge, Awlaki,  who the White House said was a key figure in al Qaeda in the Arabian  Peninsula, al Qaeda's Yemen-based affiliate, had been the only American  put on a government list targeting people for capture or death due to  their alleged involvement with militants.
The  White House is portraying the killing of Awlaki as a demonstration of  President Barack Obama's toughness toward militants who threaten the  United States. But the process that led to Awlaki's killing has drawn  fierce criticism from both the political left and right.
In  an ironic turn, Obama, who ran for president denouncing predecessor  George W. Bush's expansive use of executive power in his "war on  terrorism," is being attacked in some quarters for using similar  tactics. They include secret legal justifications and undisclosed  intelligence assessments.
Liberals criticized the drone attack on an American citizen as extra-judicial murder.
Conservatives  criticized Obama for refusing to release a Justice Department legal  opinion that reportedly justified killing Awlaki. They accuse Obama of  hypocrisy, noting his administration insisted on publishing Bush-era  administration legal memos justifying the use of interrogation  techniques many equate with torture, but refused to make public its  rationale for killing a citizen without due process.
Some  details about how the administration went about targeting Awlaki  emerged on Tuesday when the top Democrat on the House Intelligence  Committee, Representative Dutch Ruppersberger, was asked by reporters  about the killing.
The process  involves "going through the National Security Council, then it  eventually goes to the president, but the National Security Council does  the investigation, they have lawyers, they review, they look at the  situation, you have input from the military, and also, we make sure that  we follow international law," Ruppersberger said.
LAWYERS CONSULTED
Other officials said the role of the president in the process was murkier than what Ruppersberger described.
They  said targeting recommendations are drawn up by a committee of mid-level  National Security Council and agency officials. Their recommendations  are then sent to the panel of NSC "principals," meaning Cabinet  secretaries and intelligence unit chiefs, for approval. The panel of  principals could have different memberships when considering different  operational issues, they said.
The officials insisted on anonymity to discuss sensitive information.
They  confirmed that lawyers, including those in the Justice Department, were  consulted before Awlaki's name was added to the target list.
Two  principal legal theories were advanced, an official said: first, that  the actions were permitted by Congress when it authorized the use of  military forces against militants in the wake of the attacks of  September 11, 2001; and they are permitted under international law if a  country is defending itself.
Several  officials said that when Awlaki became the first American put on the  target list, Obama was not required personally to approve the targeting  of a person. But one official said Obama would be notified of the  principals' decision. If he objected, the decision would be nullified,  the official said.
A former  official said one of the reasons for making senior officials principally  responsible for nominating Americans for the target list was to  "protect" the president.
Officials  confirmed that a second American, Samir Khan, was killed in the drone  attack that killed Awlaki. Khan had served as editor of Inspire, a  glossy English-language magazine used by AQAP as a propaganda and  recruitment vehicle.
But rather  than being specifically targeted by drone operators, Khan was in the  wrong place at the wrong time, officials said. Ruppersberger appeared to  confirm that, saying Khan's death was "collateral," meaning he was not  an intentional target of the drone strike.
When  the name of a foreign, rather than American, militant is added to  targeting lists, the decision is made within the intelligence community  and normally does not require approval by high-level NSC officials.
'FROM INSPIRATIONAL TO OPERATIONAL'
Officials  said Awlaki, whose fierce sermons were widely circulated on  English-language militant websites, was targeted because Washington  accumulated information his role in AQAP had gone "from inspirational to  operational." That meant that instead of just propagandizing in favor  of al Qaeda objectives, Awlaki allegedly began to participate directly  in plots against American targets.
"Let  me underscore, Awlaki is no mere messenger but someone integrally  involved in lethal terrorist activities," Daniel Benjamin, top  counterterrorism official at the State Department, warned last spring.
The  Obama administration has not made public an accounting of the  classified evidence that Awlaki was operationally involved in planning  terrorist attacks.
But officials  acknowledged that some of the intelligence purporting to show Awlaki's  hands-on role in plotting attacks was patchy.
For  instance, one plot in which authorities have said Awlaki was involved  Nigerian-born Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, accused of trying to blow up a  Detroit-bound U.S. airliner on Christmas Day 2009 with a bomb hidden in  his underpants.
There is no doubt  Abdulmutallab was an admirer or follower of Awlaki, since he admitted  that to U.S. investigators. When he appeared in a Detroit courtroom  earlier this week for the start of his trial on bomb-plot charges, he  proclaimed, "Anwar is alive."
But  at the time the White House was considering putting Awlaki on the U.S.  target list, intelligence connecting Awlaki specifically to  Abdulmutallab and his alleged bomb plot was partial. Officials said at  the time the United States had voice intercepts involving a phone known  to have been used by Awlaki and someone who they believed, but were not  positive, was Abdulmutallab.
Awlaki  was also implicated in a case in which a British Airways employee was  imprisoned for plotting to blow up a U.S.-bound plane. E-mails retrieved  by authorities from the employee's computer showed what an investigator  described as " operational contact" between Britain and Yemen.
Authorities  believe the contacts were mainly between the U.K.-based suspect and his  brother. But there was a strong suspicion Awlaki was at the brother's  side when the messages were dispatched. British media reported that in  one message, the person on the Yemeni end supposedly said, "Our highest  priority is the US ... With the people you have, is it possible to get a  package or a person with a package on board a flight heading to the  US?"
U.S. officials contrast  intelligence suggesting Awlaki's involvement in specific plots with the  activities of Adam Gadahn, an American citizen who became a principal  English-language propagandist for the core al Qaeda network formerly led  by Osama bin Laden.
While Gadahn  appeared in angry videos calling for attacks on the United States,  officials said he had not been specifically targeted for capture or  killing by U.S. forces because he was regarded as a loudmouth not  directly involved in plotting attacks.
By Mark Hosenball taken from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/05/us-cia-killlist-idUSTRE79475C20111005
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment