Without any reference to gods, souls or afterlives, it aims to give atheists a book of inspiration and guidance as they make their way in the world.
In place of the more well-known Ten Commandments, his atheist principles are: "Love well, seek the good in all things, harm no others, think for yourself, take responsibility, respect nature, do your utmost, be informed, be kind, be courageous."
Professor Grayling, the president elect of the British Humanist Association, is unambivalent about the biblical mission of his work.
"The point about the religious bible is that it purports to give us some direction. It contains the commands of a divinity wishing us to live a certain way," he says.
A book can act as a text around which a community can be built |
"The modest offering of The Good Book is that there are as many good lives as there are people who have the talent to live them, and that people must take the responsibility for thinking for themselves and making that decision for themselves.
"What this book does is try and offer them resources for thinking about that."
The biblical comparison, however, is a little early in the book's life, according to Melvyn Bragg, author of The Book of Books: The Radical Impact of the King James Bible 1611-2011.
"When you're talking about the King James Bible, you're talking about one of the greatest works in English literature, perhaps world literature," he says.
The King James Bible was first published 400 years ago |
What is more, the King James Bible had a profound cultural impact, forming "the seed cause of democracy" which led, among other things, to the end of slavery.
"Maybe AC Grayling has written a book that over a few centuries will gain in the public's affection and imagination," he says.
"Perhaps it will, I don't know. Today it is simply no comparison whatsoever. Eventually it may turn into something else. Time marinates all sorts of things."
Better stories
AC Grayling's prescription for the good life includes wisdom "plundered" from writers and thinkers including Aristotle, Cicero and Lucretius, focussing on the meaning of the good life and how to live it, without any reference to God.
You might think that Christians would find such a book an insult to their own Good Book, but not Rev Dr Giles Fraser, Canon Chancellor of St Paul's Cathedral.
While he isn't sure of the "modesty" of "a Bible with your name on the spine", he does think that you don't have to be religious to be morally good, and that in general, atheists "need better stories".
If anything, however, Rev Dr Fraser believes that The Good Book is a bit tame, a little "cheesy", in comparison with the "full-blooded version".
The Bible is, after all, full of disasters and failures, heroic struggles between good and evil and dramatic tests of faith.
It is, he explains, "not a work of morality. It's actually a work of something deeper - the problem is not about just following a few rules, there's something more deeply wrong with the human being".
This deeper meaning of the Bible is something that has evolved through the ages - from the Council of Nicaea, which edited the early biblical texts, to translations - such as the King James Version - that brought it out of Latin and into the vernacular.
There have been graphic novels and comic strips, and even a version translated into Geordie.
For philosopher Mark Vernon - a former vicar-turned-atheist-turned-agnostic - it is partly the slow evolution of the mythical part of our culture that makes it difficult for AC Grayling's work to succeed.
Those who pieced together the Bible, not to mention others who produced much of the Greek and Roman philosophy AC Grayling references, were able to draw together countless diverse themes which we would now consider to be separate academic subjects.
Psychology and theology, philosophy and poetry melded with what Vernon calls "myth-making", tapping into myths that were already being told.
Myths, he says, have been passed down over the generations, allowing something to emerge that speaks to a part of us that cannot be communicated with rationally.
Call it sin, or call it the unconscious, he explains, it is a part of human life that we find it very difficult to see with a clear rational eye.
"It is very significant that in the century or two that religion has been struggling in the west, fiction and history are the biggest section in bookshops," he says.
"The reason is that these are ambivalent ways of telling stories that speaks to all the aspects of ourselves.
"To pretend that we can sort life out with some neat and tidy philosophy, is just deluded.
"If life was that simple we would have done that centuries ago and we would be living in a perfect world."
by Tom Colls taken from http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9446000/9446028.stm
No comments:
Post a Comment